The University of Maine student newspaper since 1875
home
Thursday, Feb. 9, 1:34 a.m.
News

Tobacco Free Campus finishes its final report

Study finds texting helps smokers quit

The Tobacco Free Campus Committee — an effort to ban tobacco products on campus — released its final report during the summer after months without progress on it. The University of Maine administration will submit a verdict on the report before Winter break.

Vice President of Student Affairs Robert Dana said UMaine President Robert Kennedy will announce the verdict on the tobacco-free campus policy. If the policy is approved, there will be a year-long transition period before the tobacco ban is implemented.

“We’re not telling people ‘don’t smoke,’ but the university does not encourage it,” Dana said.

Dana said if the initiative became policy, the university would provide resources and support to students who are unwilling to comply with the ban. He said the university would not immediately punish students for not complying with such a ban.

Jake Poirier, a third-year student, supports the initiative.

“I’ve never smoked, and I don’t like the smell,” Poirier said. “Smokers should take the time to smoke somewhere else if they really need it.”

Dana said complaints are expected and the administration is prepared for them if the initiative is implemented.

“Some people think it’s too heavy, like it’s Big Brother,” Dana said.

Jessie Colby, a first-year communication science and disorders student, said people would smoke anyway.

“Smokers are adults, and they can make their own choices,” Colby said.

First-year international affairs student Aly Desimone asked, “What about the freshmen who have to live here? Do they have to drive off campus just for a cigarette?”

If the initiative is approved, Dana said the university hopes some people may stop smoking altogether.

“The university feels responsible for the health of its students and staff,” Dana said.

In a related vein, a study has recently found texting can help people kick their smoking addiction.

Txt2Quit is a text message-based smoking cessation service, based on a study conducted by the University of Auckland in New Zealand. The study found smokers who use the program for a year can double the chances of quitting.

UMaine may adopt a system similar to Txt2Quit as the campus considers becoming tobacco free. According to a 2007 report, 9 percent of UMaine employees smoke and 6.1 percent of students use cigarettes daily. Txt2Quit is comparable to the texting system the school uses to alert students about emergencies.

“You need something to do with your hands,” said Lauri Sidelko, director of Alcohol and Drug Education programs on campus. “You’re looking for nicotine, the perception that it calms you down.” She said adopting the system would depend on the cost of the program and support. “It could work. I could see us getting there, especially if we go tobacco free.”

Txt2Quit is successful because mobile phones are integrated into daily life and are always accessible. Robyn Whittaker, a researcher at the University of Auckland, said to Bio-Medicine — an online publication — “It makes a lot of sense. They [texting services] are more proactive, delivering directly to people wherever they are.”

Texting may not work as the sole way to quit smoking. According to Sidelko, it usually takes the majority of smokers seven or more times to quit for good.

“It depends on what works for the individual,” Sidelko said. “The more they try, the more successful they’ll be. But it usually takes a couple of different methods.”

Participants of Txt2Quit receive two or three text messages a day for 26 weeks before a designated quit date. Texts contain facts about smoking, tips on quitting and support while quitting and they allow users to respond to polls. Users can also send messages to the service when they crave a cigarette.

“A vast majority of people want a tobacco-free campus,” Dana said. “I think it’s going to be good.”

  • harleyrider2009

    SECOND HAND SMOKE IS A JOKE. Ask the anti-tobacco folks to tell you what truly is in second hand smoke…when it burns from the coal its oxygenated and everything is burned and turned into water vapor………………thats right water……….you ever burned leaves in the fall…know how the heavy smoke bellows off…….thats the organic material releasing the moisture in the leaves the greener the leaves/organic material the more smoke thats made……thats why second hand smoke is classified as a class 3 irritant by osha and epa as of 2006……..after that time EPA decided to change the listing of shs as a carcinogen for political reasons…….because it contained a trace amount of 6 chemicals so small even sophisticated scientific equipment can hardly detect it ……..they didnt however use the normal dose makes the poison computation when they made this political decision. However osha still maintains shs/ets as an irritant only and maintains the dose makes the poison position…….as osha is in charge of indoor air quality its decisions are based on science not political agendas as epa’s is. We can see this is true after a federal judge threw out the epa’s study on shs as junk science……… Wednesday, March 12, 2008 British Medical Journal & WHO conclude secondhand smoke “health hazard” claims are greatly exaggerated The BMJ published report at:

    http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/7398/1057

    concludes that “The results do not support a causal relation between environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality. The association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and coronary heart disease and lung cancer are considerably weaker than generally believed.” What makes this study so significant is that it took place over a 39 year period, and studied the results of non-smokers who lived with smokers…..

    meaning these non-smokers were exposed to secondhand smoke up to 24 hours per day; 365 days per year for 39 years. And there was still no relation between environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality. In light of the damage to business, jobs, and the economy from smoking bans the BMJ report should be revisited by lawmakers as a reference tool and justification to repeal the now unnecessary and very damaging smoking ban laws. Also significant is the World Health Organization (WHO) study:

    Passive smoking doesn’t cause cancer-official By Victoria Macdonald, Health Correspondent ” The results are consistent with their being no additional risk for a person living or working with a smoker and could be consistent with passive smoke having a protective effect against lung cancer. The summary, seen by The Telegraph, also states: ‘There was no association between lung cancer risk and ETS exposure during childhood.’ ” And if lawmakers need additional real world data to further highlight the need to eliminate these onerous and arbitrary laws, air quality testing by Johns Hopkins University proves that secondhand smoke is up to 25,000 times SAFER than occupational (OSHA) workplace regulations.

    The Chemistry of Secondary Smoke About 94% of secondary smoke is composed of water vapor and ordinary air with a slight excess of carbon dioxide. Another 3 % is carbon monoxide. The last 3 % contains the rest of the 4,000 or so chemicals supposedly to be found in smoke… but found, obviously, in very small quantities if at all.This is because most of the assumed chemicals have never actually been found in secondhand smoke. (1989 Report of the Surgeon General p. 80). Most of these chemicals can only be found in quantities measured in nanograms, picograms and femtograms. Many cannot even be detected in these amounts: their presence is simply theorized rather than measured. To bring those quantities into a real world perspective, take a saltshaker and shake out a few grains of salt. A single grain of that salt will weigh in the ballpark of 100 million picograms! (Allen Blackman. Chemistry Magazine 10/08/01). – (Excerpted from “Dissecting Antismokers’ Brains” with permission of the author.)

    The Myth of the Smoking Ban ‘Miracle’ Restrictions on smoking around the world are claimed to have had a dramatic effect on heart attack rates. It’s not true. http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7451/

    As for secondhand smoke in the air, OSHA has stated outright that: “Field studies of environmental tobacco smoke indicate that under normal conditions, the components in tobacco smoke are diluted below existing Permissible Exposure Levels (PELS.) as referenced in the Air Contaminant Standard (29 CFR 1910.1000)…It would be very rare to find a workplace with so much smoking that any individual PEL would be exceeded.” -Letter From Greg Watchman, Acting Sec’y, OSHA, To Leroy J Pletten, PHD, July 8, 1997
    -harleyrider1978