The University of Maine student newspaper since 1875
home
Thursday, May 24, 11:59 a.m.
Opinion | Readers Speak

Readers Speak: Best of Web comments

RE: Dean Dana inhibits dialogue

Dean Dana’s remarks as chronicled in the Nov. 5 Maine Campus showed true leadership. He is doing his job very well.

This issue of discrimination through rights to marriage is very simple. I hope Dr. Dana continues to show students that now is always a good time to do the right thing.

— Robert

I would say that supporters of same-sex marriage view this as a moral issue as well. Matters of civil rights and equal protection are value-laden, so I would think most supporters consider it a moral imperative to extend protections to same-sex couples.

As far as opponents of same-sex marriage viewing this as solely a matter of morality — not one of discrimination — I would say that, to define “traditional marriage” as the only morally acceptable form of marriage is to disparage same-sex marriage as immoral (you essentially said as much when you said society should be careful not endorse something that is immoral).

Immoral or not, same-sex marriage would provide legal rights, so it’s impossible to divorce the “morality” of opposing it from the reality of also discriminating against a group of people.

— Derek Dobachesky