The University of Maine student newspaper since 1875
home
Wednesday, May 9, 10:51 a.m.
Opinion

Op-Ed: Women on UMaine campus need to change their clothes

Women’s clothing styles on campus are a letdown. The combinations are confusing and impractical, and I’m in awe that so many women would want to share with everyone how lamely they dress.

You’ve seen those hideous brown booties women wear — the ones that go up the calf or even above the knee. Only boring conformers wear them. Are they preparing for a trip to Siberia? No, they’re just boosting revenues for Chinese sweatshop commies and prolonging the misery of animals.

Even worse are those sweatpants with slogans on the rear. I bet whoever invented them was just looking for another way to exploit women’s buns by advertising on them. Naturally, we have to read them, and when writing is there, who can resist? How rude and distracting.

Also, women’s pants are just too tight. Either they couldn’t find comfortable, loose clothing, or they are displaying a product. They must take so long to get into, and what if you have diarrhea? They probably don’t come off too easily. Also, the tighter they are, the harder it is for us guys to get into — when we wear them. You know, like the emo guys. Don’t be a pervert.

Those “pockets” sewn on those pants are completely useless. They are uncomfortable to even put lip balm in and restrict blood flow to necessary areas of the body. They also create the need for purses, producing more animal torture and sweatshop profits. The only good thing is that they are so tight they prevent their wearers from eating too much — the food just won’t fit anywhere.

Another symptom of tight pants is thongs. Apparently, some designer decided to take the idea of dental floss and apply it to the rear. Think about the work put into your underwear by slave labor so you can show your boyfriend once a month or grin at yourself in the mirror. Thongs save cotton, but in cold weather, you’d do better to cover up. Think of the lingerie industry’s profit margin — what a disgrace.

Women’s shirts are also too tight. You can’t hide things in them like guys can when shoplifting. Plus, they create the dreaded “Jabba the Hutt” effect by demonstrating the extra ridges some women have. Last time I checked, the benchmark was one hourglass — we don’t have all day to check you out. And further, more women are buying shirts specifically to display cleavage. I say keep your skin to yourself. If I want some, I’ll ask you nicely, depending on my mood. There can’t be that many nursing moms on campus.

Lastly, jewelry only attracts thieves and takes precious dollars that could be used for charity. Tattoos are nothing more than a form of egotism, and makeup is the ultimate deception. I prefer the more natural look. I look great everyday without it. The size of the makeup industry is frightening, and it is only a tool of the devil.

Women’s clothing is impractical and far too showy. Learn a lesson from us guys, who use our clothes the way they were intended, and stop trying to attract so much attention. You look like the girls on MTV’s “My Super Sweet Sixteen.” Grow up.

Michael W. Gibson will be displaying his 2010 women’s clothing line at Goodwill in January.

  • Jordan

    Gibson’s writing style in the Campus is a letdown. The thoughts are bland and superficial, and I’m in awe that he’d want to share with everyone how lamely he writes.

    You’ve seen those hideous generalizations – the ones that objectify women, and then tell them to not be objects… Did M.W. Gibson write a good article? No, he just spit out garbage that I unfortunately read, and prolonged the misery of the peoples of the university.

    In all seriousness though, people will wear what they want to wear. I won’t argue that there are fashion victims, and many of them prescribe to the attire that you oh so powerfully described, but honestly your view is so skewed that my shattered faith in humanity was just ground into dust. Get over yourself or become a lead fashion designer and make millions selling to people based on market trends.

    Pleasant morrows.

  • http://Rjohn112@yahoo.com Rick John

    This article has already been written like 5 years ago, when Travis “Bull” Cowing was writing for the Umaine campus. This is a ripp-off artice. Travis also wrote about puck-sluts as well. Whoever this dude is that wrote this, try writing something original. But I agree, girls wear there pajamas to class and it’s considered tready in Maine. Hey, you live in MAINE dude! WHat did you expect? Seeing Paris Hilton rocking her Versace outfit every class?? Dude, some of these women come from Wytopitlock and Howland for God sake. Reality check!!

  • renae

    Rick, wearing pajamas out in public is not a Maine thing. It is a lazy, I don’t feel like getting dressed for the public and/or I have no clean clothes to wear, thing. Please don’t assoiciate it to Maine behavior. Associate it to the rag mags who print pics of celebrities wearing their pajamas in public. Associate it to the lazy; I have no clean clothes to wear, people who think it’s o.k. to do so because they saw a picture of a celebrity in their pajamas in public.

  • J. Swist

    This and the previous issue’s Travesty contra Darwin seem to be prolonging the trend that each edition of the Maine campus must permit the publication of one article of poorly-processed poppycock and armchair philosophizing by people with no formal study of the topic at hand.

    This is an institution of scholarship. Does it not follow that the things we write should reflect that?

  • Paul P

    Hahaha, I do remember the puck sluts article by Travis Cowing is a classic. Although I agree, this article is a rip off. It’s obvious that this dude is just begging for attention. No matter what kind. Go up to the search maine campus type in: Travis Cowing sluts get pucked
    or
    http://mainecampus.com/2004/04/05/sluts-get-pucked/

    HAHAHA, still true today!!!

  • Emily Hodgdon

    Rick, before I comment on this offensive article, I would like to second Renae by saying that wearing pajamas is not a Maine thing, nor is it a WOMAN thing.

    As for Mr. Gibson’s article, grow up? Clearly, you are the one who is stuck in the past. Women are not summoned to the kitchen anymore. We aren’t expected to wear dresses down to our ankles or aprons any longer. If you would like a girl who doesn’t wear Ugg boots and thongs, try Pennsylvania. I’ve heard there are plenty of Amish communities that way. Your general point of view made me describe your article in no other way than “ignorant.” If you want women to dress like men, I would have to say that you are beginning to sound sexist. If you intend to change a woman’s fashion sense, I would recommend going into fashion design. Clearly, opinion writing is not your cup of tea. However, if you intend to brand yourself date-less for the rest of your college career, well done. If you are at all offended by what I have said so far, that is the same feeling I had after reading the nonsense you posted as an opinion.

    I noticed that you mentioned the sweatshops quite a bit. If you were complaining about women contributing to “animal torture” due to the fact of buying booties, how is it any different to buy granny panties? Granny panties DO require more cotton to make. Therefore, they require more work done in the sweatshop.

    Lastly, if you have taken the time to come up with an idiotic example of having diarrhea in tight jeans, I would have to say that you have time to write an article much better than the one you have just published.

    Good luck in your next article.

  • Former student

    Dear editors of the Maine Campus, why do you keep publishing McDubs’ writings? They’re not smart, not funny, vaguely offensive but never seriously controversial, anachronistic, smarmy, poorly written, immaterial and useless. If you don’t like him and want to embarrass him because of that, this is not the forum. Don’t invite that guy, who always gets too drunk and makes an ass of himself at your parties, to more of your parties. It’s sadly funny for about ten minutes and then he pukes all over the place and pisses everyone off. Fill the space with advertising next time, or just leave it blank. Don’t denigrate yourselves.

  • Ryan Page

    I am curious to know what allowed Mr. Gibson such familiarity with the experience of wearing women’s pants.

  • Ria

    1) Maine is practically Siberia. Boots are a necessity for winter in Maine if you want to stay warm and dry.

    2) Why are you worried about our bums being cold from wearing thongs, but criticize us for wearing boots in an attempt to keep our feet warm?

    3) Perhaps the reason the women on campus are wearing such low-cut and tight clothing are because they feel pressured to look like sports illustrated swimsuit edition models. Yes, I remember that article. And from what I recall, you told us to go to the magazine for inspiration. Well, some of those models aren’t wearing tops at all, making those cleavage-baring tops seem modest.

    4) Congratulations on making at least 50% of UMaine realize what a douche bag you are. That’s quite some feat.

  • remedialone

    Ria, I agree that the guy is a douchebag, but I find it highly unlikely that 50% of Umaine would realize this. I find it unlikely that 50% of our students read this or any paper.

  • Norwhal

    Don’t ruin my fun looking at hot chicks that wear tight jeans with whale tails sticking out the top. Take your sexual frustrations to fapserver and lighten up. Many clothes made for men are manufactured in sweatshops too smart guy.

  • A

    I have a few favorite passages I’d like to point out.

    1- “I say keep your skin to yourself. If I want some, I’ll ask you nicely, depending on my mood.”

    You’ll ask? Because walking up to a woman in a t-shirt and kindly asking, ‘can I please see your breasts?’ is not creepy at all. And I really don’t get the ‘depending on my mood’ part either way.

    2- “Also, the tighter they are, the harder it is for us guys to get into — when we wear them. You know, like the emo guys. Don’t be a pervert.”

    Why is it perverted to assume a guy would want to get into a girl’s pants? I’m pretty sure it’s a perfectly normal occurrence for two college students to engage in this sort of activity, not really perverted.

    This whole article is ridiculous. Tight pants are not uncomfortable and wearing regular underwear versus a thong is not going to significantly increase the temperature of your ass, genius. I’m going to go out on a limb and assume you’ve never worn a thong (sorry if I’m wrong on that one), but they can actually be comfortable.

    Next time you want to write about something you know absolutely nothing about, I suggest keeping it in your diary.

  • Emily West

    Let’s not forget the whole purpose of a purse is to carry items around in. But I’ll remember next time when I need tampons to put them in the pocket of my tight jeans to prevent the “animal torture and sweatshop profits”. And speaking of the tightness of jeans, you do know that the fabric stretches right? I am able to put a phone, ipod, mainecard, keys, and yes lip balm in my pockets, yet this causes odd shapes in my pants messing up that “one hourglass” figure you so kindly pointed out, creating a need for…yes, a purse!

    Also, I would love for you tell me that when you see someone who has acne, that you would rather see it instead of covered up.

    Shoplifting? Seriously? Last time I checked, I bought my clothes the legal and right way! Talk about being sixteen!

    We are not all wealthy enough to go out and have custom designed pants to your liking, so we buy what is in the stores. Is that our fault?

    Please tell me, how I am suppose to wear my clothes? I thought I was supposed to wear pants to cover my legs and shirts to cover my top. But if I’m doing that wrong then let me know!

  • SuperNerd

    It’s sad that so many people don’t understand the sarcasm of this piece, and are getting their panties in a twist by taking it seriously. What’s sadder is that you, the author, keep reusing the same concept/joke (“I’m going to see how many gullible, hotheaded people I can offend!”) for so many of your Maine Campus columns. Your article about how women should compare themselves to Playboy models got quite the outraged reaction last year; this one isn’t nearly as entertaining. Can’t you write something new and even more offensive?

  • Freshman Female

    Yes, the article is poorly written. Yes, the opinions presented within are obviously designed to be controversial. However, I do think Gibson manages to include one worthwhile point: “Only boring conformers wear them.” It would be rather refreshing to see a bit more variety on campus. There is plenty of room for individuality in personal style without resorting to the suggestions proposed here.

  • A

    While I agree that there are a lot of ‘conformers’, it is kind of difficult to change it up as there is 0 places to buy clothes in Maine.

  • JdK

    Ria: Maine is not Siberia and there are plenty of other US states that get a lot colder. Try North/South Dakota, Minnesota, and Wisconsin during the winter and two minutes later you would wish that you were back in tropical Maine.

    That being said, you don’t see women wearing hideous UGG boots in those states, because hey, UGG style boots went out of fashion every where else on the planet years ago.

    Let’s face it; Mainer’s wear what they wear because 1) it is the fashion here and 2) the concept of style and looking good does not exist in this state.

    A: Not any place to shop? Heh, I kind of agree with that, but hey, this is Maine – everybody worships Beans, and North Face and UGG. Even if there were another place to shop, nobody would.

  • Ryan Page

    wisconsin? really? not… you know alaska?

  • A

    Hey, UGG boots are definitely hideous but they are super comfortable and warm.

  • Some Dude

    I would like to point out a flaw in your writing that no one has brought into the light as of yet. In your article you say that you think women are conforming and that you would like them to change the way they dress to a specific style you had in mind. If you are unable to see the flaw inherent in your statement at this point I would be happy to enlighten you. By issuing this statement you have merely asked women to conform to a different set of standards, standards that you have designed. If you truly want people not to conform then you have to let them dress however they want, as that is the only true way not to conform.

  • Briana

    I agree with you completely. The most effective way to get your point across, especially when attempting to cut down a person and/or group is to use your wit and intelligence. However, despite the fact that it seems this was a failed attempt at just that, it comes across as more pathetic than anything else. Almost as pathetic as thongs hanging out over tight, skinny jeans.

    Rather than getting the point across, this Op-Ed writer just goes to show that as disappointing as some clothing options people make are, so is letting someone write for a paper from their mother’s basement while talking to their Star Wars “action figures”.

    I don’t mean to fight petty comments and poor writing with cliches, but as much as this writer hates girls’ showing their undergarments in public, I feel he should embrace it because as soon as girls see his Ninja Turtle sheets, no one is going to take off their clothes for him!

    Lastely, I think he should get a thesaurus and an original thought, the sweatshop setting got played out by the second paragraph

  • John

    does anyone actually know what ‘Op-Ed’ means? Do yourself a favor and google it before the next time you get on the INTERNET on a FORUM to prove a point.

  • Jun

    Maybe Mike can break into the dorms and change their outfits, you know, since that is his thing, breaking and entering.