The University of Maine student newspaper since 1875
home
Thursday, May 24, 11:59 a.m.
Opinion

Op-Ed: New protest movement not my cup of tea

Mr. Olore’s seventh grade social studies class at my Presque Isle middle school was never the highlight of my hormone-ridden, adolescent days. Honestly, I didn’t care about history I couldn’t get from “The Magic School Bus” or Mel Gibson movies, so I don’t remember a whole lot from the class. But there is one subject I recall above all the rest: the Boston Tea Party.

Every American should know the story and hopefully they would have learned about it before they were almost in high school. One of the most famous protests in all of history, the quintessential event was a rallying point for the growing number of colonists opposed to British rule and eventually helped ignite the American Revolution – apparently the English are prone to flipping their wig if you mess with their tea.

I was psyched: These were real men with the courage, conviction, and American impudence to prod the tyrannical dragon that was the British Empire. “Why don’t we have people like that anymore?” I remember wondering.

Imagine my excitement, then, when I heard of the Tea Party Movement. America is no stranger to tax protests, but the modern-day movement is different, with its roots in protests of the 2009 stimulus bill. Participants and conservative organizations who support the movement have been carrying out events throughout the year protesting taxes and government spending.

The movement’s name was taken from the historical event and the taxation-based anger that led to it. Some participants have even created the acronym TEA — “Taxed Enough Already.” The faction is somewhat mysterious, due mainly to the disparate coverage it has received from the mainstream media; on the Fox News Channel, these “activists” are the story of the decade, while on MSNBC, the “teabaggers” are a never-fail punchline.

Nonetheless, the movement is gathering steam. A National Tea Party Convention was held last month featuring none other than Sarah Palin as keynote speaker and tea partiers even appeared in an issue of “Captain America.”

I had to find out what this new movement is really about. Could it be that it represents the revival of the indomitable American spirit and will shake the nation’s citizenry from our cynical complacency?

Nah. The movement has worthy cause for protesting, including the skyrocketing national debt and suspicions of government incompetency, deception and corruption. They uphold the principles of limited government and fiscal conservatism, both of which I value as well. Many aspects of the proponents I support wholeheartedly: their concern for the direction of the country, their desire to affect positive change rather than be complacent, their efforts to distance themselves from both the Democratic and Republican parties, their intention to hold our government accountable.

But despite these positive qualities, the tea party participants do not equate with their Boston Harbor predecessors who altered the course of history with their bold actions. For one thing, the colonists were not protesting taxes in general, only that the taxes had been imposed by people who were not elected officials — hence, “No taxation without representation.”

Tea partiers, on the other hand, are protesting all taxes, ignoring the basic fact that they are absolutely essential. Government at the state and federal levels use this money to run countless programs, without which our society could not possibly function. Funds can be mishandled, of course, and this is reason for concern and even protest, but unless one wants to start their own country, taxes are a necessary evil. Besides, Obama’s administration actually cut taxes for 95 percent of Americans last year, which makes the protesters’ claims look like nothing more than belligerent hot air.

The colonists involved in the Boston Tea Party were calculating, passionate advocates, with the ideas of enacting justice and forming a more perfect union. These newbies, who share a name with the revolutionaries but not much else, seem more like childish naysayers throwing a tantrum, justifiably angry about our nation’s problems but unwilling to attempt to work toward a solution with our elected officials who have the power to do something about it.

Tyler Francke has always been more of a coffee guy anyway.

  • http://www.outskirtspress.com/teapartyrevival Dr B Leland Baker

    Sir,
    I disagree with your statement that “Obama’s administration actually cut taxes for 95 percent of Americans last year, which makes the protesters’ claims look like nothing more than belligerent hot air.”

    Hopefully, you sat in on the seminar that I taught at the Tea Party National Convention … if not you missed important information about the US Government and “Finance 101″

    Spending today, and placing the payments on the backs of our children and grandchildren is a form of inter-generational theft. Truth is that deficit spending is a “deferred tax” and this administration has increased our taxes by $13,333 per man, woman and child in just 15 months.

    The propaganda that Obama and the Congress has lowered taxes for 95% of America is no more true that claiming that Obama or Bush are fiscally conservative.

    Dr B L Baker, Tea Party Revival: The Conscience of a Conservative Reborn

  • http://www.outskirtspress.com/teapartyrevival Dr B Leland Baker

    Tea Partiers are in favor of (1) Constitutional Compliance, (2) which enforces States’ and individual rights, (3) promotes a balanced budget via fiscal responsibility (lower spending and lower taxes), and (4) enforces individual responsibility.

    We recognize some taxes are essential … but much pork is bogus … and socialism does not work.

    Dr B L Baker, Tea Party Revival (Amazon)

  • remedialone

    Pork spending accounts for 1.1% of the budget. In fact under Obama earmarks went down 25% from the Bush administration. It kind of seems like your organization has selective amnesia at best or potentially are willfully ignorant. I also find it an amusing arguement from someone who worked for over 26 years in the federal government and draws a pension fully funded by the American tax payers to complain about government spending.

  • jimmyk

    I applaud your political activism but I don’t understand the obvious hypocrisy of your movement. Your mantra is that we support the constitution, want a balanced budget etc… Really? Who doesn’t? I am pretty sure those are ideals shared by most people. When the details are laid out, that is where it gets blurry. You put your own political figures like Reagan on a pedestal yet he spent like a drunken sailor and continued a trend of growing debt that started before him and continued after him. If anything you all should be gushing over Clinton. He did nothing for the debt but at least spent what he took in for part of his time in office. If your group is going to start a third party and run on your ideals, great! That is what our country needs. There is not a lot of variety out there and dems and repubs have not been doing a good job. I don’t think that is going to happen though, it’s not what you want. Call a spade a spade and let’s call the Tea Party movement a well organized rally to pull disenfranchised conservative voters to the ballot box to vote republican. There is nothing wrong with that. Just get off the high horse and stop comparing yourselves to patriots of the real ‘Tea Party’. Your movement will hold no critical place in American history despite the rhetoric and self-declared importance that comes out of it.

  • I.C. Bias

    Reagan, a big spender? His last budget deficit was $92.5 billion, which is chump change compared to the record trillion-dollar-plus deficits of Obama.

    Tyler Francke is employing the classic straw man argument in accusing the Tea Party of opposing all taxes, even though some are essential. I challenge him to produce evidence of any Tea Party protest against “all taxes.”

    As for his defense of the supposed Obama tax cuts for “95 percent of Americans,” only the most naive observer truly believes that every working American — and not only “the rich” — will be getting skewered by higher taxes, higher inflation and/or a devalued dollar when it comes time to pay for Obama’s runaway deficits.

    Young Tyler needs to stop believing the White House hype and start doing his homework.

  • remedialone

    When Reagan took office the national debt was less than a trillion dollars, by the time he left it was over 2 and a half trillion. For Obama to cause the same damage that Reagan did to this country he would have to leave office with a national debt of 25 trillion.

  • I.C. Bias

    Huh? $25 trillion??? This isn’t a story problem involving ratios or proportions.

    The simple fact is that Obama has already increased the national debt by $2 trillion. As CBS News writes: “it took (Bush) over four years to rack up the first two trillion dollars in debt. It has taken Mr. Obama 421 days.”

    To wit:
    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20000576-503544.html

    And there’s no end in sight to Obama’s spending spree.

    When Reagan came in, the Misery Index (unemployment plus inflation) was 19.72, having reach its worst level in history under Carter. By the time Reagan left, it had declined to 9.72.

    Under Carter, it had skyrocketed from 12.66 to 19.72.

    Under Obama, it zoomed from 7.63 to 12.72 in December 2009 — the worst America has seen since 1983.

    Reagan got the country working again. Obama hasn’t whipped unemployment even after wasting $787 billion on a stimulus bill that hasn’t stimulated anything other than the SEIU, ACORN and Chris Matthews’ leg.

  • http://www.outskirtspress/teapartyrevival Dr B Leland Baker

    I do not disagree with Tyler’s personal opinion, I merely disagree with his alleged “facts” as in my previous post.

    In addition, he worngly stated, “Tea partiers, on the other hand, are protesting all taxes, ignoring the basic fact that they are absolutely essential. Government at the state and federal levels use this money to run countless programs…” Wrong hypothesis!

    Tyler, like many freshman political science pundits, fails to differentiate between “All Taxes” and those that are (1) authorized and (2) essential. First, the taxes by the Federal Government should pertain to their roles and functions in the U.S. Constitution … many are not.

    Secondly, he writes about “State and Federal” in the same breath. The Founders intended the two to be separate and distinct, with more government at local level, less at State and even less at the Federal level. Tea Partiers want to restore the original intent.

    I.C. Bias is correct … Tea Partiers are not against “all taxes” … we are against unconstitutional spending and misappropriation. As a University Professor, I’d give Tyler an “F” on his lack of research.

    To JimmyK … If you read my book, or saw me on the PBS Special on the Tea Party Movement, I did give credit to Clinton, and I told it like it was on Bush’s fiscal irresponsibility as well.

    In addition, just as I am protesting against Obama’s unconstitutional initiatives; I protested against Bush’s as well. No change there.

    Obama is part of the ’cause’ of the Tea Party Movement … Obama blasted Bush’s fiscal irresponsibility for 18 months before becoming President. Then, after educating the American population and becoming President he did the same reckless fiscal policy as Bush (times two). Let me state this clearly: Bush’s last year in office was as reckless as Obama’s first … and Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dummer have set the United States up for fiscal collapse.

    The major concern at this point is survival of the United States as a Nation. Our money is near collapse on the world market due to bad fiscal policy. Our debt to GDP ration is now 90% … watch Greece and you will see the future of the US currency.

    Pundits like Tyler are helping the current administration “pull a fast one” based upon emotion and political bias rather than fact. And people in your age group are going to get stuck with the bill.

    Dr B Leland Baker, author Tea Party Revival