The University of Maine student newspaper since 1875
home
Thursday, May 24, 11:59 a.m.
News

Budget: Athletics loses $7M a year

Amount spent on educational instruction drops 6 percent since 1987

The Educational and General Base Budget reports, which detail the projected annual budget of the University of Maine, reveal the athletic department is losing millions of dollars annually. Other financial documents indicate the university is spending less of its budget on educational instruction now than it was in previous decades.

In the current fiscal year — which runs July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010 — athletics is projected to cost the university $7.3 million more than the revenue it brings in.

Athletic Director Blake James said the athletic department is subsidized by the university, but that the projected loss of $7 million sounded high. James said he thought the actual loss would be closer to $5 million.

“We try to generate about half of our own budget,” James said in reference to UMaine athletics. “We generate somewhere in the $5 million range from ticket sales, the athletic store and multimedia. We want to maximize revenue as much as we can.” James added that the amount the athletics department brings in depends on how teams perform in the season.

The budget for fiscal 2010 projected the athletics department would generate about $4.5 million in revenue, falling far short of its expected $12.2 million in expenditures. This discrepancy would be covered by revenue in the general university budget, the vast majority of which comes from tuition and state appropriations.

It is common for Division I athletic programs to receive university subsidies, and the amount of these subsidies has grown in recent years, according to a national analysis done by USA Today in January. If the 2010 budget provides an accurate estimate, UMaine is in the 25 percent of higher learning institutions that receives the largest percentage in university subsidies.

The university’s priciest athletic program is the football team, which cost almost $1.2 million this year, according to the report for fiscal 2010. The men’s ice hockey team was budgeted about $900,000, while the women’s and men’s basketball teams are both projected to cost the university more than $500,000.

“We’re evaluating our situation,” James said. Last year, the athletic department was forced to suspend the university’s volleyball and men’s soccer programs, and this year another $300,000 must be trimmed off next year’s budget by May, James said.

“We’re not considering cutting any other sports,” James said. “Never say never, but I don’t see us cutting more teams.”

UMaine currently has 17 Division I sports teams and must retain at least 14 to stay in Division I athletics.

Beyond the numbers, James said the value of UMaine athletics is immeasurable.

“There are so many values,” James said. Athletics “brings the campus community together, unifies students and alumni, and it raises awareness of our campus nationwide.” James also said graduated student-athletes are generous financial supporters, such as former basketball player Richard Collins who, with his wife, donated $5 million to the renovation of the Collins Center for the Arts.

The bulk of sports teams’ operating costs comes from coaches’ salaries and benefits. James said budgeting for coaches’ salaries is troublesome because the athletic department must set the amount before it knows how much revenue the teams will bring in. James does not think UMaine coaches are overpaid.

“I think our coaches do a great job working within their means and giving athletes a first-class experience,” James said. “I’m satisfied with the budget we have, given the financial challenges our state is going through. We get great support from the university and alumni.”

In the wake of the Academic Programs Prioritization Work Group’s report released last week, which recommends drastic academic changes, some critics on The Maine Campus Web site have suggested athletics, not academics, should take the brunt of any cuts.

There appears to be a historical trend in the financial documents from decennial accreditation reports indicating student education has been slipping on the university’s priority list. These reports made by UMaine, which were prepared for the New England Association of Schools and Colleges, show the university has steadily decreased its allocations for academic instruction from its peak of 28.3 percent of its budget in fiscal 1987 to only 22.7 percent last year. Instead, the university has spent more on research, which rose about 5 percent in the same time period, as well as institutional support (2 percent) and student services (1 percent).

Susan Hunter, vice president of academic affairs and provost, said although she had been involved in preparing the most recent accreditation report in 2009, she was not aware such a decrease had occurred.

“I would have thought we would be spending more on instruction now,” Hunter said. She said the cost of many factors that affect instruction, such as benefit rates and health insurance, have increased this decade.

Vice President for Administration and Finance Janet Waldron could not be reached for comment by press time.

The university’s Educational and General Base Budget reports from fiscal years 2006-2010 are available for student viewing at the Fogler Library Reserve Desk. The university’s accreditation reports from 1988, 1999 and 2009 can also be found at Fogler in Special Collections on the third floor.

CORRECTION:
A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that UMaine has 15 Division I sports. UMaine has 17 Division I sports.

---

  • http://Rjohn112@yahoo.com Rick John

    This should make all the fat, out of shape liberals happy.

  • Faculty

    It is truly a sad day when major academic programs at a land grant are being cut while athletics is being subsidized to the tune of $5-7 million.

    If these cuts go through, the University of Maine will have the sad status of being the only land grant university in the country without majors in foreign languages, music and theatre. Does the administration intend that we become a third rate institution? This doesn’t serve the state’s needs nor will it attract excellent students from Maine and away.

    Furthermore, while this has been unfolding, our president has been cutting a deal for himself, securing a golden parachute that will cost taxpayers at least $1 million in the three years he holds the phony, make-work job at the University of Maine System. He benefits from a major conflict of interest, having not defended the land-grant and then getting rewarded from the former president of USM and current chancellor of the system who would be happy to bring UMaine down a notch.

  • Ryan Page

    This college’s emphasis on sports is really frustrating. We have enough meatheads in the world. We should cut the athletics budget and do something good with it, like actually saving academic programs…

  • Sean

    I think it makes sense to decrease the athletic budget at the same rate the academic budget is cut. I think it would be hard to say that one sport, such as football or softball brings more students than the majors that would be cut under the new proposal.

  • Michael Pare

    While these figures may be accurate there are some numbers that you really can’t tabulate with the statistics available. Like how much notoriety having division one sports generates for a university. To many people considering a university the athletic programs are just as large a concern as the academics. I doubt that the cost of the programs can or would be completely recovered through the tuition gained by having these programs, but that aspect of athletics is often ignored. Adam Clark wrote a column this week addressing some of these issues and I think anyone who thinks athletic programs are a waste of University funds should read it and consider the points raised before jumping to conclusions.

  • http://zachdionne.tumblr.com Zach Dionne

    Nice reportage, Francke. Lot of intense stuff lately.

  • Ryan Page

    “To many people considering a university the athletic programs are just as large a concern as the academics.”

    Clearly that is not something the University system should support. The University’s here to teach people, not entertain them.

  • michael pare

    I would disagree that the only purpose of sports is to entertain drunks and attract meatheads, but that is a different discussion.

    The University of Maine also exists within a much larger national higher learning system and to compete on that level has to make an effort to do so both athletically and academically.

    The theater program is scheduled to be cut..would you justify the removal of this program under the same set of principles?

    The University IS here to teach people, but that doesn’t always have to be interpreted through the lens of academics. Oftentimes meaningful lessons that may not be important to you, but are vital to others, are learned through art, culture and yes sports.

  • Freddy Cruger

    Ryan, so your saying cut theatre, music, and all forms of entertainment from the University? Participating in collegiate athletics will offer many life lessons to students, ones in which many will not learn until later in life, after their degrees are earned.

  • Scott Darling

    I guess I should put down my road sodas for a few weeks!

  • Homer

    the college’s emphasis on letting people like you in is really frustrating…save us from the freak show

  • Anon

    Obvious troll is obvious

  • Marcy Sullivan

    So if you play a collegiate sport or attend any athletic contest, that automatically means you are a meathead. Hmmm, ok, that makes COMPLETE sense. Did you ever consider that because of our nationally recognized hockey program, UMaine receives a tremendous amount of FREE exposure throughout the country and into Canada, thus promoting the school, its academic programs, AND sports? Did you ever think about how most of the donations that come into the school come from former athletes? How exactly are graduates from other programs (non-athletics) supporting the school financially through endowments and donations?
    Perhaps it is time to come out from under your rock and really think about how much athletics actually support the University in other ways that your small brain may not recognize, and thus benefit other academic programs.
    Sure, it’s upsetting to see how many academic programs are being cut and it certainly pains me to see that occur because a well-rounded person needs to be exposed to music, culture, and sports, but athletics are being cut, too. Unfortunately, the programs being cut don’t bring much money INTO the university, while athletics does. Maybe it is time to reconsider the fundraising efforts of the departments being cut and why there are so few, if any, donors stepping up to help out.

  • Jun

    Well, ahh I think the University is first here for itself. In that sense it needs to fill itself up with students, then it can teach them. Less students equals less administration, which means less old guys getting fat salaries, which would be horrible.

    So, first we fill the ranks so we can get paid, then we educate. We need athletics.

  • Jun

    +1, except the trolls are everywhere so it really doesn’t matter.
    This is a troll farm.

  • Ryan Page

    “Did you ever consider that because of our nationally recognized hockey program, UMaine receives a tremendous amount of FREE exposure throughout the country and into Canada, thus promoting the school, its academic programs, AND sports?”

    That exposure is far from free.

  • Jun

    True.
    There aren’t a lot of avenues UM gets good publicity.

    There is the advanced composites lab, the geology dept with their ice cores… that’s all I’ve seen in national media and it is better than nothing.

    However, Hockey isn’t exactly free exposure if we’re putting millions into the program, is it?

    Seems like millions could be better spent, but UM without hockey would just be a sad place.

  • Marcy Sullivan

    So when one of our sports teams plays in Florida or Boston and the game is covered by local papers and/or tv, that is not free exposure to the school? I suppose that winning the Hockey National Championships in 93 and 99 had no impact on interest in the school, or apparel/misc. purchases or applications to the school or nationwide recognition. Ok. Whatever.
    I guess that the Duke men’s basketball team and the exposure they get by national television coverage and coverage in the papers from their game results has no effect on increasing their name recognition outside of the southeast.
    Maybe it is time to start thinking out of the box here and seeing beyond the “millions” that are put into the program.
    Ever hear of economic impact?? It’s really no wonder that in many aspects Maine continues to be so small considering all the small-minded people who make decisions.