The University of Maine student newspaper since 1875
home
Wednesday, May 9, 10:51 a.m.
News

Video: Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul visits Bangor

BANGOR — The crowd jammed into the Union Street Church in Bangor, known locally as the Brick Church, quieted when Paul Madore, Maine chairman for Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul’s presidential campaign, stepped up to the podium.

He had just begun to introduce the candidate when the room erupted in applause. People leapt from their seats or craned their necks from the standing-room section that wrapped around the perimeter of the church, struggling to see the candidate as he entered and took the stage, smiling and waving.

A thunderous chant of “Ron Paul” solidified from what began as unfocused, overlapping cheers. No introduction was necessary.

“We have not come here today to win an election,” Madore said before ceding the microphone to Paul. “We have come here to change the course of history.”

Paul’s remarks, which kicked off a two-day tour of Maine, took him to Colby College and then Lewiston on Friday. Saturday, he appeared at the University of Southern Maine’s Gorham campus, Freeport and Alfred.

His Bangor talk ranged from what he views as the fallacy of the entitlement mentality to the overarching need for personal liberty. He celebrated the effect his message has had on energizing young voters and said he was pleased with how his ideas were being received.

He discussed the need for a balanced budget and reduced government spending, claiming that adhering more strictly to the Constitution would have been influential in avoiding financial crisis.

“We got to this point where just printing more money, spending more money, doesn’t seem to be working, and that’s why they’re giving our ideas a lot more attention,” Paul said. “Even with last night’s [debate in Florida], they’ve started to respect what we’re talking about.

“We as a people have allowed our politicians and our courts to just plain ignore the Constitution,” he continued, going so far as saying politicians have acted “outside the rule of law” by establishing regulatory bodies not provided for by the founding fathers, explicitly mentioning the Department of Education.

“It’s the lack of respect for the rule of law that has gotten us into this mess,” Paul said.
Paul addressed the “entitlement” mentality, saying it sounded “pretty good” in theory but claiming it is not a feasible or allowable aim for government to pursue. He added that “socialist, communist nations” have the goal of perfect equality but said governments’ attempts to attain that equality are damaging to society.

“We as individuals are entitled to our life, to our liberty, but we’re not entitled to someone else’s life or liberty,” he said.

“Yes, they’re equal,” he added later, “but they’re equally harmed by what the government has done.”

He transitioned to the need for protecting private property and advocated a reining-in of federal security measures that, in his opinion, are ineffective.

“We should never be tempted to give up liberty to be any safer, because it won’t make us better,” Paul said, specifically mentioning full-body scanners used by the Transportation Security Administration at airports around the country.

Earlier this month, TSA agents at Nashville International Airport blocked Sen. Rand Paul, Ron Paul’s son and a Kentucky Republican, from boarding a flight to Washington after an “anomaly” was detected on a scanner and Rand Paul refused a full-body pat-down. He missed his flight but was able to board a different plane later.

Ron Paul targeted the Patriot Act, arguing for its repeal. He also addressed SOPA, shorthand for the recently controversial Stop Online Piracy Act bill proposed in the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill was killed Jan. 20 when Rep. Lamar Smith, the Texas Republican who sponsored it, pulled it from consideration.

“The Internet is the weapon of liberty as far as I’m concerned,” Paul said. “There’s a continuous attack on our liberties.”

Paul promised, if elected, to cut government spending by $1 trillion in his first year as president and to only go to war if a formal declaration of war were issued.

“We will not be going to war at any whim,” he said, adding that President Barack Obama has been “expanding wars” and some legislators in Washington “can’t wait to start a war with the Iranians.”

“I don’t want to be the policeman of the world,” he continued.

Paul wrapped up his remarks by turning to suggestions for balancing the federal budget, stipulating that he would return to the 2006 baseline budget.

“We must cut, and there has to be priorities,” he said. “I don’t see it as sacrifices. … I think the people who will have to sacrifice are the people who are living off the government.

“Those who are willing to take care of themselves, it’s not going to be a sacrifice for you,” he continued.

Due to the length of Paul’s speech, a Q-and-A session was foregone in order to allow time for supporters to have photos taken with the candidate.

Standing in a line that snaked around the emptied chairs, Eric Lichtenberg, president of the College Republicans at the University of Maine and a fourth-year political science student, said Paul’s message was “fantastic.”

“Honestly, I would have come for any of the candidates, but Ron Paul’s my first choice,” he said.

“I like where he stands on the whole liberties issue.”

When asked why he thought Paul’s message attracted so many younger voters, Lichtenberg answered with a laugh. “Young people like freedom,” he said.

At USM, Hastings Formal Lounge was filled to capacity for the speech, with some gathering in an overflow room in Bailey Hall to watch the speech on closed-circuit television.
Many of those in attendance were enthusiastic Paul supporters, like Alexandra Mediate, 20, of South Portland.

Mediate, who studied for two years at the University of Southern Maine, said she plans to vote for Paul during the upcoming Maine Republican caucuses, slated to start Feb. 4 and run through Feb. 11.

“I love Ron Paul, he’s my favorite candidate,” Mediate said. “He gives me faith in politics, a little.”
Dylan LaJoie, a junior political science student at USM, said while he doesn’t always agree with Paul’s beliefs, he respects the candidate for consistency.

“For as long as he’s been running for office now, his opinions have been staying the same, for the most part,” he said.

Back in Bangor, UMaine College Republicans Cameron Marcotte, a first-year political science student, and Jake DuBois, a third-year business management student, said young people are hearing Paul’s message because of a sense of urgency.

“The fact of the matter is, nobody likes being intruded on by the government,” Marcotte said.

“I think a lot of people are just frustrated,” DuBois said. “They want a successful future.”

Noah Hurowitz, news editor for The Free Press, USM’s weekly student newspaper, contributed reporting from Gorham. This story was updated on Jan. 30.

 

  • Anonymous

    If you like a Limited Constitutional Government, a strong national defense and personal freedoms, Ron Paul is the best choice. Ron Paul’s biggest campaign donors are the US Army, US Navy, and US Air Force. The other candidates (Obama, Romney) Top Donors are Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Wall Street fat cats, etc.

  • Anonymous

    There is much to the man beyond his familiar libertarian pitch for individual liberty above all else, and much of it flies right in the face of the idea of government as part of the social contract, the real glue that ties together the disparate parts of any functional civilized society. Rep. Paul, had he his “druthers,” would repeal the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, thus he makes a disconnect between civil liberties and civil rights, doesn’t he? His image of the US role in world affairs has more in common with the isolationists of old than of a new look. He would take us out of the UN if he could. Is that seriously good thing for a shrinking globe? Was it ever a good thing? Was rejecting the opportunity to lead through the League of Nations good for world affairs? One civil liberty the majority support but he opposes is a woman’s right to make her own decision as to reproduction. I wonder how many of the college-age women in his youth crusade agree. Rep. Paul, ever the self described free marketeer recently told a South Carolina audience that adoption of the gold standard is a biblical admonition. Really? How market-driven is that? He seems to think simple market forces alone would deal adequately with cleaning our physical environmental. True, to the delight of many of his adherents he would decriminalize drugs, which may not be a bad thing in and of itself, but the jail cells emptied by it would surely be filled female replacements who made the wrong reproductive decision, again assuming he gets his “druthers.”  There is much more Thomas Hobbes than Thomas Jefferson in the man, something folks ought read and think about before swooning. They also might take a look at his Maine spokesmen and their various past crusades. 

  • http://twitter.com/jmofaustin Jacqueline

    You have not read Ron Paul’s books, you are going by hearsay. Never once does Ron Paul say he would make abortion illegal, he just will not fund it at the federal level. PLEASE, do everyone a favor, if you are going to comment on an article, at least know the facts, not what you have “heard”. It makes you look uneducated. You are wrong about everything you said, show me facts and I will listen, until then, quit spewing lies, btw, that is called slander.

  • Anonymous

    Add sound money with a balanced budget (a real balanced budget, not like the last smoke and mirror phoney balanced budgets). It’s all do-able. The current governmental (both parties) resistance to all of these ideas, is not based on impossibility or even difficulty, but on the loss of profiteering by those who do not hold the people’s needs in concern.

  • Anonymous

    Quote: When asked why he thought Paul’s message attracted so many younger voters, Lichtenberg answered with a laugh. “Young people like freedom,” he said.

    There is another factor as well. Because of very severe media bias, avoiding the very mention of his name at every juncture, Ron Paul took to the internet for public exposure. The current freedom of the internet (now suffering attempts for censorship) allows outreach in an unprecedented manner, out of need.

    His message spreads through those demographics who utilize the internet the most, hence a lot of younger voters. Make no mistake, he’s not locked into a “young voter only” box. There are a lot of seniors getting on the net, and for the first time see a lot of conflict between traditional media and untampered information on the net.

    In viewing the comment of “hpmcg” I see much disinformation (or possibly just misinformation) but it’s the type of skewed uninformed information we get from main stream media. Simply buying a book on Amazon of Dr Paul’s, or viewing speeches on YouTube (25 years of them) will answer most of that poster’s concerns.

    Make informed decisions on what he actually says and thinks in his own words, rather than what is said “for him” or “about him”.